Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel-gpu-tools: Version information

2013-12-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: >> Yeah, this is definitely very useful. But I'd just print it by default >> so that we don't need to ask for this information. Of course we need >> to be careful to not print it when listing subtest. Also: >> - We don't have any init stuff for s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel-gpu-tools: Version information

2013-12-07 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 01:36:47PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Ben Widawsky > wrote: > > Provide two arguments version, and verbose, which allow printing from an > > arbitrary igt test. It will show system information (from build time, > > not runtime), as well as

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel-gpu-tools: Version information

2013-12-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Provide two arguments version, and verbose, which allow printing from an > arbitrary igt test. It will show system information (from build time, > not runtime), as well as the git SHA being used. > > This will help reduce errors when people try

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel-gpu-tools: Version information

2013-12-06 Thread Ben Widawsky
Provide two arguments version, and verbose, which allow printing from an arbitrary igt test. It will show system information (from build time, not runtime), as well as the git SHA being used. This will help reduce errors when people try to reproduce problems. As an example if I want to verify som