Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915: fix ironlake edp panel setup (v4)

2010-07-01 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:46:17 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > > The eDP spec claims a 20% overhead for the 8:10 encoding scheme used on the > wire. Take this into account when picking the lane/clock speed for the panel. > > v3: some panels are out of spec, try our best to deal w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915: fix ironlake edp panel setup (v4)

2010-06-30 Thread Ben Guthro
Sorry. no change in behavior, with my E6410. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > > The eDP spec claims a 20% overhead for the 8:10 encoding scheme used on the > wire. Take this into account when picking the lane/clock speed for the panel. > > v3: some panel

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915: fix ironlake edp panel setup (v4)

2010-06-29 Thread Dave Airlie
From: Dave Airlie The eDP spec claims a 20% overhead for the 8:10 encoding scheme used on the wire. Take this into account when picking the lane/clock speed for the panel. v3: some panels are out of spec, try our best to deal with them, don't refuse modes on eDP panels, and try the largest all