On 2010.06.29 09:47:04 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 16:44 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > On 2010.06.28 14:04:56 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > sorry, this is still broken on the 16x9 panel.
> > >
> > > 'intel_dp_link_required' is 107840*18/8 = 242640,
> > > 'intel_dp
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 16:44 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2010.06.28 14:04:56 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> >
> > sorry, this is still broken on the 16x9 panel.
> >
> > 'intel_dp_link_required' is 107840*18/8 = 242640, 'intel_dp_max_data_rate'
> > is
> > 27*1*8/10 = 216000. So it will fail i
This also didn't fix the Dell E6410. I'll also note this in the bug.
I'm trying to work with some contacts at Dell to get this routed to
the right person as well...but am having limited luck with that, so
far.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:04 PM,
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2010.06.28 09:45:14 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> So the previous fix didn't work for everyone, I read the eDP spec and claims
>> a 20% overhead for encoding, so make sure we take this into account when
>> working o
On 2010.06.28 09:45:14 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> So the previous fix didn't work for everyone, I read the eDP spec and claims
> a 20% overhead for encoding, so make sure we take this into account when
> working out the bandwidth requirements.
>
> This makes my eDP panel
From: Dave Airlie
So the previous fix didn't work for everyone, I read the eDP spec and claims a
20% overhead for encoding, so make sure we take this into account when working
out the bandwidth requirements.
This makes my eDP panel happy also, please test on others.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
