Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dyndbg: add special aux_print framework

Hi Jim, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linux/master linus/master v5.14-rc3 next-20210730] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dyndbg: add special aux_print framework

Hi Jim, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linux/master linus/master v5.14-rc3 next-20210730] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest t

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dyndbg: add special aux_print framework

Sean Paul seanp...@chromium.org proposed, in https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/78133/ drm/trace: Mirror DRM debug logs to tracefs The problem with the approach is that its built upon splitting drm_debug_enabled() into syslog & trace flavors, which clashes rather profoundly with the strategy

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dyndbg: add special aux_print framework

Sean Paul seanp...@chromium.org proposed, in https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/78133/ drm/trace: Mirror DRM debug logs to tracefs The problem with the approach is that its built upon splitting drm_debug_enabled() into syslog & trace flavors, which clashes rather profoundly with the strategy