On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:57:58AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
> > connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
> > around this. This should address the below loc
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
> connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
> around this. This should address the below lockdep splat:
[ ... snip ... ]
> v2: Rebase onto the right branch (hand-e
On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
> connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
> around this. This should address the below lockdep splat:
Jiri, a Tested-by on this would be appreciated.
BR,
Jani
drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
around this. This should address the below lockdep splat:
==
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detect
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:15:14PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
> connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
> around this. This should address the below lockdep splat:
>
> Cc: Imre Deak
> Cc: Chris Wilson
On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
> connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
> around this. This should address the below lockdep splat:
>
> ==
drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
around this. This should address the below lockdep splat:
==
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detect