Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Don't split up debug output

2013-11-18 Thread Thierry Reding
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:25:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Otherwise we risk that the 2nd part of the line ends up on a line of > it's own, which means a kernel dmesg line without a log level. This > then upsets the dmesg checker in piglit. > > Only really happens in some of the truly nasty

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Don't split up debug output

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
Otherwise we risk that the 2nd part of the line ends up on a line of it's own, which means a kernel dmesg line without a log level. This then upsets the dmesg checker in piglit. Only really happens in some of the truly nasty igt testcases which race cache dropping (through debugfs) with other gem