On 28/07/15 14:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Styled after WARN_ON/DRM_ERROR_ON, this prints a mild warning message (a
> KERN_NOTICE for significant but mild events) that allows us to insert
> interesting events without alarming the user or bug reporting tools.
>
Wouldn't it be better to opt for DRM_NO
On 28/07/15 14:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Styled after WARN_ON/DRM_ERROR_ON, this prints a mild warning message (a
> KERN_NOTICE for significant but mild events) that allows us to insert
> interesting events without alarming the user or bug reporting tools.
>
Wouldn't it be better to opt for DRM_NO
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:58:27PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 28/07/15 14:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >Styled after WARN_ON/DRM_ERROR_ON, this prints a mild warning message (a
> >KERN_NOTICE for significant but mild events) that allows us to insert
> >interesting events without alarming the user
On 28/07/15 14:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
Styled after WARN_ON/DRM_ERROR_ON, this prints a mild warning message (a
KERN_NOTICE for significant but mild events) that allows us to insert
interesting events without alarming the user or bug reporting tools.
For an example I have changed a DRM_ERROR for
Styled after WARN_ON/DRM_ERROR_ON, this prints a mild warning message (a
KERN_NOTICE for significant but mild events) that allows us to insert
interesting events without alarming the user or bug reporting tools.
For an example I have changed a DRM_ERROR for being unable to set a
performance enhanc
