Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/vgem: Remove unecessary dma_fence_ops

2018-08-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 01:48:42PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-08-09 13:45:44) > > dma_fence_default_wait is the default now, same for the trivial > > enable_signaling implementation. > > > > Also remove the ->signaled callback, vgem can't peek ahead with a > > fastpat

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/vgem: Remove unecessary dma_fence_ops

2018-08-09 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-08-09 13:45:44) > dma_fence_default_wait is the default now, same for the trivial > enable_signaling implementation. > > Also remove the ->signaled callback, vgem can't peek ahead with a > fastpath, returning false is the default implementation. > > v2: Protect the mea

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/vgem: Remove unecessary dma_fence_ops

2018-08-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
dma_fence_default_wait is the default now, same for the trivial enable_signaling implementation. Also remove the ->signaled callback, vgem can't peek ahead with a fastpath, returning false is the default implementation. v2: Protect the meaningful space! (Chris) Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: