On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:52:52PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:46:04PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > If we ever leak a non-DP compliant port width through here, we have a
> > pretty serious issue. So just rip out all these WARNs - if we need
> > them it's probably bett
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:46:04PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> If we ever leak a non-DP compliant port width through here, we have a
> pretty serious issue. So just rip out all these WARNs - if we need
> them it's probably better to have them at a central place where we
> compute the dp lane coun
If we ever leak a non-DP compliant port width through here, we have a
pretty serious issue. So just rip out all these WARNs - if we need
them it's probably better to have them at a central place where we
compute the dp lane count.
Also use the new DDI width macro for FDI mode.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni
S
