On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:55:08 +0200, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> Also ditch the cargo-culted dev_priv checks - either we have a
> giant hole in our setup code or this is useless. Plainly bogus
> to check for it in either case.
>
> v2: Chris Wilson noticed that I've missed one bogus dev_priv check.
>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:55:08 +0200, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> Also ditch the cargo-culted dev_priv checks - either we have a
> giant hole in our setup code or this is useless. Plainly bogus
> to check for it in either case.
>
> v2: Chris Wilson noticed that I've missed one bogus dev_priv check.
>
Also ditch the cargo-culted dev_priv checks - either we have a
giant hole in our setup code or this is useless. Plainly bogus
to check for it in either case.
v2: Chris Wilson noticed that I've missed one bogus dev_priv check.
v3: The check in the overlay code is redundant (Chris)
Signed-off-by:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:19:31 +0200, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> index 0f0fe31..aa14235 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> @@ -1122,10 +1122,8 @@
Also ditch the cargo-culted dev_priv checks - either we have a
giant hole in our setup code or this is useless. Plainly bogus
to check for it in either case.
v2: Chris Wilson noticed that I've missed one bogus dev_priv check.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
