Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: make default minimum frequency RP1 instead of RPN

2012-10-26 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:32:08 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > Jesse Barnes writes: > > > We should only ever go below RP1 for thermal reasons. Users can still > > control this through sysfs by manually reducing the minimum frequency > > (and max if they want to clamp their frequency for power reason

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: make default minimum frequency RP1 instead of RPN

2012-10-26 Thread Eric Anholt
Jesse Barnes writes: > We should only ever go below RP1 for thermal reasons. Users can still > control this through sysfs by manually reducing the minimum frequency > (and max if they want to clamp their frequency for power reasons, e.g. > to keep fans off or something). I think I know what the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: make default minimum frequency RP1 instead of RPN

2012-10-26 Thread Jesse Barnes
We should only ever go below RP1 for thermal reasons. Users can still control this through sysfs by manually reducing the minimum frequency (and max if they want to clamp their frequency for power reasons, e.g. to keep fans off or something). Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915