Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: kick firmware fbs even when i915 fbdev is disabled

2013-12-17 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Otherwise we don't kick out firmware framebuffers like vesafb and > efifb when CONFIG_DRM_I915_FBDEV=n but CONFIG_FB=y. > > There's still the pesky issue with vgacon which we should somehow > replace with the dummy console at least. We have a similar iss

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: kick firmware fbs even when i915 fbdev is disabled

2013-12-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
Otherwise we don't kick out firmware framebuffers like vesafb and efifb when CONFIG_DRM_I915_FBDEV=n but CONFIG_FB=y. There's still the pesky issue with vgacon which we should somehow replace with the dummy console at least. We have a similar issue at module un/reload, since vgacon state is termin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: kick firmware fbs even when i915 fbdev is disabled

2013-12-16 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Otherwise we don't kick out firmware framebuffers like vesafb and > efifb when CONFIG_DRM_I915_FBDEV=n but CONFIG_FB=y. > > There's still the pesky issue with vgacon which we should somehow > replace with the dummy console at least. We have a similar iss

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: kick firmware fbs even when i915 fbdev is disabled

2013-12-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
Otherwise we don't kick out firmware framebuffers like vesafb and efifb when CONFIG_DRM_I915_FBDEV=n but CONFIG_FB=y. There's still the pesky issue with vgacon which we should somehow replace with the dummy console at least. We have a similar issue at module un/reload, since vgacon state is termin