On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:39:03PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:04:48PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > >> So all together I vote for the generic interface to be called something
> > >> like
> > >>
> > >> int
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:04:48PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >> So all together I vote for the generic interface to be called something
> >> like
> >>
> >> intel_aux_display_runtime_forbid/allow
> >
> > I changed to intel_aux_display_
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> So all together I vote for the generic interface to be called something
>> like
>>
>> intel_aux_display_runtime_forbid/allow
>
> I changed to intel_aux_display_shutdown_forbid/allow, because we
> forbid the shutdown, not the "runtime".
2013/4/17 Daniel Vetter :
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:47:44PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> From: Paulo Zanoni
>>
>> This patch implements "Display Sequences for Package C8", from the
>> "Display Mode Set Sequence" section from the Haswell documentation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni
>> ---
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:47:44PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni
>
> This patch implements "Display Sequences for Package C8", from the
> "Display Mode Set Sequence" section from the Haswell documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni
> ---
>
> Hi
>
> This patch was teste
From: Paulo Zanoni
This patch implements "Display Sequences for Package C8", from the
"Display Mode Set Sequence" section from the Haswell documentation.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni
---
Hi
This patch was tested and the machines do enter C8+, so it shows our driver is
not preventing C8+. There
