On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:20:11 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> If you feel strongly about a module parameter being the better solution,
> I will code it up.
The more I think about about it, the more opposed I am to putting
parameters in debugfs, or more correctly being caught putting them there.
;-)
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23:28AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:46:53 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:48:22AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:49:14 -0700, Ben Widawsky
> > > wrote:
> > > > Provide a user accessible way to c
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:46:53 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:48:22AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:49:14 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > Provide a user accessible way to change the hangcheck timer. This is
> > > useful mostly for disabling the time
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:48:22AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:49:14 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > Provide a user accessible way to change the hangcheck timer. This is
> > useful mostly for disabling the timer completely (value <= 0).
>
> Having i915.hangcheck_interval as
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:49:14 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Provide a user accessible way to change the hangcheck timer. This is
> useful mostly for disabling the timer completely (value <= 0).
Having i915.hangcheck_interval as a read/write module parameter was
better. :-p
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson,
Provide a user accessible way to change the hangcheck timer. This is
useful mostly for disabling the timer completely (value <= 0).
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
Cc: Keith Packard
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 88 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
