On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:42:14AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Daniel Vetter
>
> They've changed it ... for no apparent reason. Meh.
>
> V2: remove unused 'is_hsw' field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni
Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
Paulo Zanoni writes:
> +#define HSW_PTE_UNCACHED 0x
Are you sure this value should be zero? It seems pretty unlikely to me.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgptzbyqd415W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lis
From: Daniel Vetter
They've changed it ... for no apparent reason. Meh.
V2: remove unused 'is_hsw' field.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.h|1 +
drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c| 105 +++
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Daniel Vetter
>
> They've changed it ... for no apparent reason. Meh.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
> ---
> drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.h| 1 +
> drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c| 107
>
> dri
From: Daniel Vetter
They've changed it ... for no apparent reason. Meh.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.h| 1 +
drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c| 107
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 5 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i9
