On Thu, 09 May 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:47:01AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 08 May 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
>>
>> Shouldn't this be headed for 3.10 through -fixes?
>
> The hpd filtering is only in -next thus f
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:47:01AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 08 May 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
>
> Shouldn't this be headed for 3.10 through -fixes?
The hpd filtering is only in -next thus far. Or have I botched up my patch
tracking again?
-D
On Wed, 08 May 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
Shouldn't this be headed for 3.10 through -fixes?
Jani.
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-g
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:10:29PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> commit 142e239849c800f9dc23f828762873073f612d3f
> Author: Egbert Eich
> Date: Thu Apr 11 15:57:57 2013 +0200
>
> drm/i915: Add bit field to record which pins have received HPD events (v3)
>
> added a bit field for hotplug event
commit 142e239849c800f9dc23f828762873073f612d3f
Author: Egbert Eich
Date: Thu Apr 11 15:57:57 2013 +0200
drm/i915: Add bit field to record which pins have received HPD events (v3)
added a bit field for hotplug event tracking. There ended up being three
different v3 of the patch: [1], [2],
