Hi list,
Am 26.07.2013 21:46, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:54:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:21:48PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Apparently Bspec is wrong in this case here even for gm45. Note
that
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:54:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:21:48PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Apparently Bspec is wrong in this case here even for gm45. Note that
> > > Bspec is horribly misguided on i965g/gm, so w
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:21:48PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Apparently Bspec is wrong in this case here even for gm45. Note that
> > Bspec is horribly misguided on i965g/gm, so we don't have any other
> > data points besides that it seems to make ma
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Apparently Bspec is wrong in this case here even for gm45. Note that
> Bspec is horribly misguided on i965g/gm, so we don't have any other
> data points besides that it seems to make machines work better.
>
> With this changes all the bits in PORT_HOTPLU
Apparently Bspec is wrong in this case here even for gm45. Note that
Bspec is horribly misguided on i965g/gm, so we don't have any other
data points besides that it seems to make machines work better.
With this changes all the bits in PORT_HOTPLUG_STAT for the digital
ports are ordered the same wa
