Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer->ring should be signed

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:16:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:03:29AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things. > > > > Sorry, I should have said that it's not a gcc warning, it's a > smatch thing. But also it's not uber

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer->ring should be signed

Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 11:03 +0100 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things. which was introduced by the following commit. 96154f2faba5: "drm/i915: switch ring->id to be a real id" > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter The URL of the report is the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer->ring should be signed

gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index b