On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:35:53PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/7/25 Jesse Barnes :
> > Art confirms that this should work fine. Since most panels are 18bpp
> > with dithering from 24bpp, the existing code wouldn't be enabled in most
> > cases.
> >
>
> I previously said I tested this in the
2013/7/25 Jesse Barnes :
> Art confirms that this should work fine. Since most panels are 18bpp
> with dithering from 24bpp, the existing code wouldn't be enabled in most
> cases.
>
I previously said I tested this in the past and it didn't work. So
today I tested it again and I discovered that th
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:17:59 +0100
> Chris Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:06:50AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> > Art confirms that this should work fine. Since most panels are 18bpp
>> > with dithering from 24bpp, the existin
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:17:59 +0100
Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:06:50AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Art confirms that this should work fine. Since most panels are 18bpp
> > with dithering from 24bpp, the existing code wouldn't be enabled in most
> > cases.
> >
> > Signed-
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:06:50AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Art confirms that this should work fine. Since most panels are 18bpp
> with dithering from 24bpp, the existing code wouldn't be enabled in most
> cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |
Art confirms that this should work fine. Since most panels are 18bpp
with dithering from 24bpp, the existing code wouldn't be enabled in most
cases.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/driver
