On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:55:37PM -0800, abhay.ku...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Abhay Kumar
>
> Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
> if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
>
> v2: Use CLOCK_BOOTTIME and remove jiffies for panel power cycle
>
From: Abhay Kumar
Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
v2: Use CLOCK_BOOTTIME and remove jiffies for panel power cycle
delay calculation(Ville).
v3: Addressing Ville review comment.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 06:27:24PM -0800, Kumar, Abhay wrote:
>
>
> On 1/7/2016 10:15 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:18:52PM -0800, abhay.ku...@intel.com wrote:
> >> From: Abhay Kumar
> >>
> >> Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
> >>
On 1/7/2016 10:15 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:18:52PM -0800, abhay.ku...@intel.com wrote:
From: Abhay Kumar
Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
v2: Use CLOCK_BOOTTIME and remo
On 12/21/2015 5:18 PM, Kumar, Abhay wrote:
From: Abhay Kumar
Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
v2: Use CLOCK_BOOTTIME and remove jiffies for panel power cycle
delay calculation(Ville).
Cc: Vill
On 1/5/2016 3:04 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:30:53AM +, Kumar, Abhay wrote:
Ville,
Is this patch is coming close to what you wanted?
Please don't bottom-post but not quote properly - no one will ever find
your comment and assume you accidentally sent out the p
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:30:53AM +, Kumar, Abhay wrote:
> Ville,
>
> Is this patch is coming close to what you wanted?
Please don't bottom-post but not quote properly - no one will ever find
your comment and assume you accidentally sent out the patch twice. If you
have to use a broken mai
Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12) if
this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
v2: Use CLOCK_BOOTTIME and remove jiffies for panel power cycle
delay calculation(Ville).
Cc: Ville Syrjälä
Signed-off-by: Abhay Kumar
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i
From: Abhay Kumar
Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
v2: Use CLOCK_BOOTTIME and remove jiffies for panel power cycle
delay calculation(Ville).
Cc: Ville Syrjälä
Signed-off-by: Abhay Kumar
---
dri
: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: edp resume/On time optimization.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:33:41AM +, Kumar, Abhay wrote:
> Changed the implementation using boottime and removed jiffies. Please review
> and let us know if this is close.
Comments like these should be part of the patch subm
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:33:41AM +, Kumar, Abhay wrote:
> Changed the implementation using boottime and removed jiffies. Please review
> and let us know if this is close.
Comments like these should be part of the patch submission itself,
including a note about which reviewer made the sugges
Changed the implementation using boottime and removed jiffies. Please review
and let us know if this is close.
-Original Message-
From: Kumar, Abhay
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 11:55 AM
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Kumar, Abhay
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: edp resume/On time
From: Abhay Kumar
Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
Change-Id: Ied0f10f82776af8e6e8ff561bb4e5c0ce1dad4b3
Signed-off-by: Abhay Kumar
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
Hi Abhay,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.4-rc3]
[also build test ERROR on next-20151217]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next v4.4-rc5 v4.4-rc4]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/abhay-kumar-intel-com/drm-i915-edp-resume-On-time-optimization/20151218-143043
config: i386-randcon
From: Abhay Kumar
Make resume codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
Change-Id: Ied0f10f82776af8e6e8ff561bb4e5c0ce1dad4b3
Signed-off-by: Abhay Kumar
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/int
ch, but that's my current thinking
yes.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 2:56 AM
> To: Kumar, Abhay
> Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PA
AM
To: Kumar, Abhay
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: edp resume/On time optimization.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 02:16:38PM -0800, abhay.ku...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Abhay Kumar
>
> Make resume codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_dela
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 02:16:38PM -0800, abhay.ku...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Abhay Kumar
>
> Make resume codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
> if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhay Kumar
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
On 12/16/2015 03:46 AM, abhay.ku...@intel.com wrote:
From: Abhay Kumar
Make resume codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
Signed-off-by: Abhay Kumar
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915
Is this something close to what we wanted to optimize for edp resume time and
using wall clock.
-Original Message-
From: Kumar, Abhay
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 2:17 PM
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Kumar, Abhay
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: edp resume/On time optimization.
From: Abhay Kumar
Make resume codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
Signed-off-by: Abhay Kumar
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 18 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i91
21 matches
Mail list logo
