On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:54:42PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > If test is running, irq_get was not called so we should gain
> > balance by not doing irq_put
> >
> > "So the rule is: if you access unlocked values, you use ACCESS_O
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:54:42PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> If test is running, irq_get was not called so we should gain
> balance by not doing irq_put
>
> "So the rule is: if you access unlocked values, you use ACCESS_ONCE().
> You don't say "but it can't matter". Because you simply don't kn
If test is running, irq_get was not called so we should gain
balance by not doing irq_put
"So the rule is: if you access unlocked values, you use ACCESS_ONCE().
You don't say "but it can't matter". Because you simply don't know."
-- Linus
v2: use local variable so it can't change during test (Chr
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:47:22PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> If test is running, irq_get was not called so we should
> gain balance by not doing irq_put
>
> v2: use local variable so it can't change during test (Chris)
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
If test is running, irq_get was not called so we should
gain balance by not doing irq_put
v2: use local variable so it can't change during test (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/
