On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:03:32 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> This patch hasn't shown up in your -next pull request. Please consider
> merging for 3.2.
So small I missed it? I'll send it in the next set after Dave merges
what I've posted so far.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp1jiX7
Hi Keith,
This patch hasn't shown up in your -next pull request. Please consider
merging for 3.2.
Yours, Daniel
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:02:58PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 10/11/11 11:27 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > i'm getting tempted to just disable temporal
> > Approved.
> > apparen
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:02:58 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 10/11/11 11:27 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > i'm getting tempted to just disable temporal
> > Approved.
> > apparently it makes the screen look pulse-y which is worse
> > than the disease.
> >
> > References:
> > http://lists.freed
On 10/11/11 11:27 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
i'm getting tempted to just disable temporal
Approved.
apparently it makes the screen look pulse-y which is worse
than the disease.
References:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2011-October/012545.html
Tested-by: Олег Герман
Cc: Ad
i'm getting tempted to just disable temporal
Approved.
apparently it makes the screen look pulse-y which is worse
than the disease.
References:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2011-October/012545.html
Tested-by: Олег Герман
Cc: Adam Jackson
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
