On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Jani Nikula
wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Stéphane Marchesin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Jani Nikula
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Imre Deak wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:20:57AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>>> >> I believe it i
Quoting Tahvanainen, Jari (2017-08-18 15:26:03)
> " Do we have a bug about this at bugs.freedesktop.org?" I did quick query on
> fdo.bugzilla and did not find any matching item (afaik) from there (with
> i915_feature = GPU *hang*|*DMC*) so I would claim that bug is not filed.
> Stephane can corr
--Original Message-
From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 12:08 PM
To: Stéphane Marchesin
Cc: Deak, Imre ; Rodrigo Vivi ;
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Matt Atwood
; Saarinen, Jani
; Tahvanainen, Jari
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Stéphane Marchesin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Jani Nikula
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Imre Deak wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:20:57AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> >> I believe it is worth allowing RPM to work without requiring DMC, no?!
>> >
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Jani Nikula
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:20:57AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> >> I believe it is worth allowing RPM to work without requiring DMC, no?!
> >
> > Not if there is no good reason for not using DMC. It
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:20:57AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> I believe it is worth allowing RPM to work without requiring DMC, no?!
>
> Not if there is no good reason for not using DMC. It was decided early
> on that we won't support that configuration s
;> is saved when RPM is turned on with DMC missing vs both turned off, So
> >> i think D3 is definitely relevant even without DMC.
> >>
> >> From: Deak, Imre
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 1:17 PM
> >> To: Rodrigo Vivi
> >> Cc: Atwood, Matthew S; inte
both turned off, So
>> i think D3 is definitely relevant even without DMC.
>>
>> From: Deak, Imre
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 1:17 PM
>> To: Rodrigo Vivi
>> Cc: Atwood, Matthew S; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; marc...@google.com;
>
ng you need to enable DC6/9 for
> that. I'm not even sure if it's even valid to enter PCI D3 without
> enabling these states first. And for that you need the firmware.
>
> >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> From: D
ithout DMC.
From: Deak, Imre
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 1:17 PM
To: Rodrigo Vivi
Cc: Atwood, Matthew S; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; marc...@google.com;
Matt Atwood
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: decouple runtime PM enablement from
DMC presence
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at
> >> From: Deak, Imre
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 10:33 AM
> >> To: Atwood, Matthew S
> >> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; marc...@google.com; Matt Atwood
> >> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: decouple runtime PM enablement
&
From: Rodrigo Vivi [rodrigo.v...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 1:02 PM
To: Deak, Imre
Cc: Atwood, Matthew S; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; marc...@google.com;
Matt Atwood
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: decouple runtime PM enablement from
DMC presence
On W
> There is no reason to support that configuration.
What if someone doesn't really want to use DMC but still wants D3hot?
>
>>
>> From: Deak, Imre
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 10:33 AM
>> To: Atwood, Matthew
ednesday, June 14, 2017 10:33 AM
> To: Atwood, Matthew S
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; marc...@google.com; Matt Atwood
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: decouple runtime PM enablement
> from DMC presence
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:12:21AM -0700, matthew.s.atw
t DMC loaded we want to keep runtime PM disabled" - Why?
From: Deak, Imre
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 10:33 AM
To: Atwood, Matthew S
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; marc...@google.com; Matt Atwood
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: decoup
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:12:21AM -0700, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Matt Atwood
>
> Runtime PM is disabled when DMC firmware is not present. Runtime PM is still
> enabled even if DMC firmware fails to load.
Hm, that would be a bug, but I can't see how it can happen; could you
exp
From: Matt Atwood
Runtime PM is disabled when DMC firmware is not present. Runtime PM is still
enabled even if DMC firmware fails to load. This patch enables runtime PM to
be enabled if DMC firmware is not present.
Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c | 7 +++
1
17 matches
Mail list logo
