On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:49:34PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2012/7/12 Daniel Vetter :
> > Instead of having a giant if cascade to figure this out according to
> > the passed-in register. We could do quite a bit more cleaning up and
> > all by using the port at more places, but I think this shou
2012/7/12 Daniel Vetter :
> Instead of having a giant if cascade to figure this out according to
> the passed-in register. We could do quite a bit more cleaning up and
> all by using the port at more places, but I think this should be part
> of a bigger rework to introduce a struct intel_digital_po
Instead of having a giant if cascade to figure this out according to
the passed-in register. We could do quite a bit more cleaning up and
all by using the port at more places, but I think this should be part
of a bigger rework to introduce a struct intel_digital_port which
would keep track of all t
