On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:36:26AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:10:50AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:43:39PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > I think this is a nice generalization on it's own, but it's primarily
> > > prep work for my PPGTT su
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:10:50AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:43:39PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > I think this is a nice generalization on it's own, but it's primarily
> > prep work for my PPGTT support. Does this bother anyone?
> >
> > The only down side I can see
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:43:39PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> I think this is a nice generalization on it's own, but it's primarily
> prep work for my PPGTT support. Does this bother anyone?
>
> The only down side I can see is we waste 2k of cpu unmappable space
> (unless we have something else
I think this is a nice generalization on it's own, but it's primarily
prep work for my PPGTT support. Does this bother anyone?
The only down side I can see is we waste 2k of cpu unmappable space
(unless we have something else that is <= 2k and doesn't need to be page
aligned).
It's RFC because I
