On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:49:31PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/8/21 Daniel Vetter :
> > If we don't use the return value of a mmio read our coding style is to
> > use the POSTING_READ macro. This avoids cluttering the mmio traces.
> >
> > While at it add the missing posting read in the lcpll
2013/8/21 Daniel Vetter :
> If we don't use the return value of a mmio read our coding style is to
> use the POSTING_READ macro. This avoids cluttering the mmio traces.
>
> While at it add the missing posting read in the lcpll enable function
> that Paulo spotted.
>
> v2: Drop the _NOTRACE changes,
If we don't use the return value of a mmio read our coding style is to
use the POSTING_READ macro. This avoids cluttering the mmio traces.
While at it add the missing posting read in the lcpll enable function
that Paulo spotted.
v2: Drop the _NOTRACE changes, tracing such wait_for loops in the mo
