Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled

2014-12-29 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Otherwise we'll have backtraces in assert_panel_unlocked because the > BIOS locks the register. In the reporter's case this regression was > introduced in > > commit c31407a3672aaebb4acddf90944a114fa5c8af7b > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Thu Oct 18 21

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled

2014-12-03 Thread Francois Tigeot
Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:43:59PM +0100, Alexey Orishko wrote: One more question slightly out off topic: - could I use i915 driver with other Intel Atom CPUs, such as D2550 and Avoton C2550? Anything newer than what you have right now likely means gma500 (which is horrib

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled

2014-12-02 Thread shuang . he
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied PNV -1 364/364 3

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled

2014-12-02 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:43:59PM +0100, Alexey Orishko wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > Otherwise we'll have backtraces in assert_panel_unlocked because the >> > BIOS locks the register. In the reporter's case this r

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled

2014-12-02 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:43:59PM +0100, Alexey Orishko wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Otherwise we'll have backtraces in assert_panel_unlocked because the > > BIOS locks the register. In the reporter's case this regression was > > introduced in > > > > commit c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled

2014-12-02 Thread Alexey Orishko
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Otherwise we'll have backtraces in assert_panel_unlocked because the > BIOS locks the register. In the reporter's case this regression was > introduced in > > commit c31407a3672aaebb4acddf90944a114fa5c8af7b > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled

2014-12-01 Thread Alexey Orishko
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Alexey, please test this patch. Ok, I will. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled

2014-12-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
Otherwise we'll have backtraces in assert_panel_unlocked because the BIOS locks the register. In the reporter's case this regression was introduced in commit c31407a3672aaebb4acddf90944a114fa5c8af7b Author: Chris Wilson Date: Thu Oct 18 21:07:01 2012 +0100 drm/i915: Add no-lvds quirk for S