On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 09:57:32PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I looked at this and it gets ugly fast. Given that we seem to have a quite
> substantial false-positive (found one more by just reading recent bug
> spam) rate and haven't enabled this on gen5+ I've decided to just merge
> this one he
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 10:56:06AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 08:35:01AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:52:22PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > There's quite a few bug reports with error states where the error
> > > reasons makes just about no
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 08:35:01AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:52:22PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > There's quite a few bug reports with error states where the error
> > reasons makes just about no sense at all. Like dying on tlbs for a
> > display plane that's not ev
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:52:22PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> There's quite a few bug reports with error states where the error
> reasons makes just about no sense at all. Like dying on tlbs for a
> display plane that's not even there. Also users don't really report a
> lot of bad side effects g
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> There's quite a few bug reports with error states where the error
> reasons makes just about no sense at all. Like dying on tlbs for a
> display plane that's not even there. Also users don't really report a
> lot of bad side effects generally, just the e
There's quite a few bug reports with error states where the error
reasons makes just about no sense at all. Like dying on tlbs for a
display plane that's not even there. Also users don't really report a
lot of bad side effects generally, just the error states.
Furthermore we don't even enable thes
