On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
> I'm thinking the crtc->base.enabled check is actually pointless.
> AFAICS we should never get here with crtc->base.enabled==false and
> crtc->active==true
Hm yeah. I was kinda shooting for the minimal thing here.
> We anyway re-enable the
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 02:37:53PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We expect this bit to be always set when possible, but some BIOSes are
> lazy and don't do this. The result is a pile of WARNs and unhappy fdi
> link training code ...
>
> v2: It's actually the inverse: The BIOS sets this bit when it
We expect this bit to be always set when possible, but some BIOSes are
lazy and don't do this. The result is a pile of WARNs and unhappy fdi
link training code ...
v2: It's actually the inverse: The BIOS sets this bit when it's not
strictly needed. This should be cleaned up in the
global_modeset_r
