On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 10:55 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> >
> > With commit 4aa7fb9c ("drm/i915/dmc: Step away from symbolic
> > links") we started loading the firmware version directly
> > instead of symbolic links.
> >
> > With this VERSION_REQUIRED var
On ke, 2016-08-10 at 12:26 +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 10/08/16 06:57, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > With commit 4aa7fb9c ("drm/i915/dmc: Step away from symbolic
> > links") we started loading the firmware version directly
> > instead of symbolic links.
>
> However the pathnames in the patch context
On 10/08/16 06:57, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With commit 4aa7fb9c ("drm/i915/dmc: Step away from symbolic
links") we started loading the firmware version directly
instead of symbolic links.
However the pathnames in the patch context below are still the symlink
names -- is this correct? Or did some m
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> With commit 4aa7fb9c ("drm/i915/dmc: Step away from symbolic
> links") we started loading the firmware version directly
> instead of symbolic links.
>
> With this VERSION_REQUIRED variables changed the meaning
> from minimal required to exact version requ
With commit 4aa7fb9c ("drm/i915/dmc: Step away from symbolic
links") we started loading the firmware version directly
instead of symbolic links.
With this VERSION_REQUIRED variables changed the meaning
from minimal required to exact version required. Along
with this change we started using the lat