Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reserving some Multi-thread forcewake bits.

2022-04-14 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 14:14 -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 05:39:27PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Bit 0: Currently bit used by i915. Ideally only i915 touches it > >    in a Linux stack. > > > > Bits 1 and 2: A while ago we were using Bit 1 for i915 and bit 2 > >    

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reserving some Multi-thread forcewake bits.

2022-04-14 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 05:39:27PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Bit 0: Currently bit used by i915. Ideally only i915 touches it >in a Linux stack. > > Bits 1 and 2: A while ago we were using Bit 1 for i915 and bit 2 > for the user space, until commit 7130630323c5 ("drm/

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reserving some Multi-thread forcewake bits.

2022-04-13 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Bit 0: Currently bit used by i915. Ideally only i915 touches it in a Linux stack. Bits 1 and 2: A while ago we were using Bit 1 for i915 and bit 2 for the user space, until commit 7130630323c5 ("drm/i915: Use fallback forcewake if primary ack missing") changed it