On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:34:32PM +0530, Deepak S wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 29 April 2015 03:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:20:20AM +0530, Deepak S wrote:
> >>
> >>On Wednesday 29 April 2015 12:02 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:16:29AM -0700,
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 03:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:20:20AM +0530, Deepak S wrote:
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 12:02 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:16:29AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On 03/04/2015 08:08 PM, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:20:20AM +0530, Deepak S wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 29 April 2015 12:02 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:16:29AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >> On 03/04/2015 08:08 PM, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >>> From: Deepak S
> >>>
> >>> When GPU is id
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 12:02 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:16:29AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On 03/04/2015 08:08 PM, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Deepak S
When GPU is idle on VLV, Request freq to punit should be good enough to
get the voltage back to VNN.
On Tuesday 28 April 2015 11:46 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Yeah I think this is fine (may need a rebase though, you can keep my r-b
if you do that in case Jani doesn't want to deal with the merge conflicts).
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes
Sure Jesse, I will rebase the patch.
Thanks
Deepak
___
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:16:29AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 08:08 PM, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Deepak S
> >
> > When GPU is idle on VLV, Request freq to punit should be good enough to
> > get the voltage back to VNN. Also, make sure gfx clock force applies
> > b
On 03/04/2015 08:08 PM, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Deepak S
>
> When GPU is idle on VLV, Request freq to punit should be good enough to
> get the voltage back to VNN. Also, make sure gfx clock force applies
> before requesting the freq fot vlv.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop
On Monday 13 April 2015 05:40 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:55:12PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Deepak S
When GPU is idle on VLV, Request freq to punit should be good enough to
get the voltage back to VNN. Also,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:55:12PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Mar 2015, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Deepak S
> >
> > When GPU is idle on VLV, Request freq to punit should be good enough to
> > get the voltage back to VNN. Also, make sure gfx clock force applies
> > before
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Deepak S
>
> When GPU is idle on VLV, Request freq to punit should be good enough to
> get the voltage back to VNN. Also, make sure gfx clock force applies
> before requesting the freq fot vlv.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 5889
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
PNV -1 280/280
From: Deepak S
When GPU is idle on VLV, Request freq to punit should be good enough to
get the voltage back to VNN. Also, make sure gfx clock force applies
before requesting the freq fot vlv.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75244
suggested-by: Jesse Barnes
Signed-off-by:
12 matches
Mail list logo
