Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-12-02 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:04:50PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2014-12-01 14:36 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : >> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:41:42AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> >> 2014-11-26 16:17 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : >> >> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-12-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:04:50PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2014-12-01 14:36 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:41:42AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> 2014-11-26 16:17 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : > >> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:37:07PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> >> 2

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-12-01 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2014-12-01 14:36 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:41:42AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2014-11-26 16:17 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : >> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:37:07PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> >> 2014-11-24 14:02 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : >> >> > Apparently PCH fifo un

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-12-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:41:42AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2014-11-26 16:17 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:37:07PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> 2014-11-24 14:02 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : > >> > Apparently PCH fifo underruns are tricky, we have plenty reports that >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-12-01 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2014-11-26 16:17 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:37:07PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2014-11-24 14:02 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : >> > Apparently PCH fifo underruns are tricky, we have plenty reports that >> > we see the occasional underrun (especially at boot-up). >> > >> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-11-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:37:07PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2014-11-24 14:02 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : > > Apparently PCH fifo underruns are tricky, we have plenty reports that > > we see the occasional underrun (especially at boot-up). > > > > So for a change let's see what happens when we don

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-11-26 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:37:07PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2014-11-24 14:02 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : > > Apparently PCH fifo underruns are tricky, we have plenty reports that > > we see the occasional underrun (especially at boot-up). > > > > So for a change let's see what happens when we don

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-11-26 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2014-11-24 14:02 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : > Apparently PCH fifo underruns are tricky, we have plenty reports that > we see the occasional underrun (especially at boot-up). > > So for a change let's see what happens when we don't re-enable pch > fifo underrun reporting when the pipe is disabled. D

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-11-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:02:45PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Apparently PCH fifo underruns are tricky, we have plenty reports that > we see the occasional underrun (especially at boot-up). > > So for a change let's see what happens when we don't re-enable pch > fifo underrun reporting when the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-11-24 Thread shuang . he
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied PNV 367/367

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns

2014-11-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
Apparently PCH fifo underruns are tricky, we have plenty reports that we see the occasional underrun (especially at boot-up). So for a change let's see what happens when we don't re-enable pch fifo underrun reporting when the pipe is disabled. This means that the kernel can't catch pch fifo underr