Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Mark fastboot as unsafe

On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:41:16 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Fastboot in its current incarnation assumes that the pfit isn't > > relevatn for the state and that it can be disabled without > > restarting the crtc. Unfortunately that's

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Mark fastboot as unsafe

On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Fastboot in its current incarnation assumes that the pfit isn't > relevatn for the state and that it can be disabled without restarting > the crtc. Unfortunately that's not the case on gen2/3 - it upsets the > hw and results in a blac

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Mark fastboot as unsafe

Dear Daniel, thank you for the support in #intel-...@irc.freenode.net and the patch. As already commented in the bug report #84682, there are some typos. Am Dienstag, den 04.11.2014, 15:29 +0100 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > Fastboot in its current incarnation assumes that the pfit isn't > relevatn f

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Mark fastboot as unsafe

Fastboot in its current incarnation assumes that the pfit isn't relevatn for the state and that it can be disabled without restarting the crtc. Unfortunately that's not the case on gen2/3 - it upsets the hw and results in a black screen. Worse, the way the current fastboot hack is structure we can