On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:03:21 +0100
Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 20:24:15 -0700, Ben Widawsky
> wrote:
> > I couldn't reproduce this one, but... Interrupt mask state is lost
> > if three interrupts occur before the workqueue has run.
> >
> > Should be straight forward to reproduce
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 20:24:15 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> I couldn't reproduce this one, but... Interrupt mask state is lost if
> three interrupts occur before the workqueue has run.
>
> Should be straight forward to reproduce even without SMP. I'm pretty
> sure Dan Vetter was trying to explain
I couldn't reproduce this one, but... Interrupt mask state is lost if
three interrupts occur before the workqueue has run.
Should be straight forward to reproduce even without SMP. I'm pretty
sure Dan Vetter was trying to explain this to me, and I couldn't get it.
My solution I think is different
