Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-03-21 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 03:42:53PM +0200, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 16:58 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > Op 24-02-17 om 14:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:30:58PM

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-03-21 Thread Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 16:58 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > Op 24-02-17 om 14:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:30:58PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > > Op 20-02-17 om 14:38 schreef Ville Syrjälä: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-03-02 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 24-02-17 om 14:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:30:58PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 20-02-17 om 14:38 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > >>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:04:06AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-02-25 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 24-02-17 om 14:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:30:58PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 20-02-17 om 14:38 schreef Ville Syrjälä: >>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:04:06AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Op 17-02-17 om 16:01 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com: >>>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-02-24 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:30:58PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 20-02-17 om 14:38 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:04:06AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 17-02-17 om 16:01 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com: > >>> From: Ville Syrjälä > >>> > >>> In order to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-02-20 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 20-02-17 om 14:38 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:04:06AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 17-02-17 om 16:01 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com: >>> From: Ville Syrjälä >>> >>> In order to make cursor updates actually safe wrt. watermark programming >>> we have to cl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-02-20 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:04:06AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 17-02-17 om 16:01 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > In order to make cursor updates actually safe wrt. watermark programming > > we have to clear the legacy_cursor_update flag in the atomic

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-02-20 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 17-02-17 om 16:01 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > In order to make cursor updates actually safe wrt. watermark programming > we have to clear the legacy_cursor_update flag in the atomic state. That > will cause the regular atomic update path to do the necessary

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:04:44PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Ville, > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:01:59PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > In order to make cursor updates actually safe wrt. watermark programming > > we have to clear the le

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-02-17 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello Ville, On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:01:59PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > In order to make cursor updates actually safe wrt. watermark programming > we have to clear the legacy_cursor_update flag in the atomic state. That > will cause the regular atomi

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix legacy cursor vs. watermarks for ILK-BDW

2017-02-17 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä In order to make cursor updates actually safe wrt. watermark programming we have to clear the legacy_cursor_update flag in the atomic state. That will cause the regular atomic update path to do the necessary vblank wait after the plane update if needed, otherwise the vblank wa