Chia-I,
I've pushed an updated version of the patch to -staging and added acks
from both Kristian and Jesse since they both agreed with your assessment
of the bug.
Thanks,
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Intel-gfx maili
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:55:13 +0800
>> Chia-I Wu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> According to the doc for page_flip, intel_crtc_page_flip should
>>>
>>> ... block all rendering to the
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:49:17 +0800
Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:55:13 +0800
> > Chia-I Wu wrote:
> >
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> According to the doc for page_flip, intel_crtc_page_flip should
> >>
> >> ... block all rende
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:55:13 +0800
> Chia-I Wu wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> According to the doc for page_flip, intel_crtc_page_flip should
>>
>> ... block all rendering to the current fb until the flip has
>> completed.
>>
>> I am not e
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:55:13 +0800
Chia-I Wu wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> According to the doc for page_flip, intel_crtc_page_flip should
>
>... block all rendering to the current fb until the flip has
>completed.
>
> I am not entirely sure, but it seems that it is
> work->old_fb_obj->pending
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:55:13 +0800, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> According to the doc for page_flip, intel_crtc_page_flip should
>
>... block all rendering to the current fb until the flip has
>completed.
>
> I am not entirely sure, but it seems that it is
> work->old_fb_obj->pending
Hi list,
According to the doc for page_flip, intel_crtc_page_flip should
... block all rendering to the current fb until the flip has
completed.
I am not entirely sure, but it seems that it is
work->old_fb_obj->pending_flip that needs to be incremented instead of
work->pending_flip_obj->pe
