On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:28:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:23:17PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > In this atomic age, we can't trust the plane->fb pointer anymore.
> > It might get update too late. Instead we are suppos
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:23:17PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> In this atomic age, we can't trust the plane->fb pointer anymore.
> It might get update too late. Instead we are supposed to use the
> plane_state->fb pointer instead. Let's do that in
> intel
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 04:30:48PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 19/01/16 16:23, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > In this atomic age, we can't trust the plane->fb pointer anymore.
> > It might get update too late. Instead we are supposed to use the
> > pl
On 19/01/16 16:23, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä
In this atomic age, we can't trust the plane->fb pointer anymore.
It might get update too late. Instead we are supposed to use the
plane_state->fb pointer instead. Let's do that in
intel_plane_obj_offset() and avoid pr
From: Ville Syrjälä
In this atomic age, we can't trust the plane->fb pointer anymore.
It might get update too late. Instead we are supposed to use the
plane_state->fb pointer instead. Let's do that in
intel_plane_obj_offset() and avoid problems from dereferencing the
potentially stale plane->fb p
