On Mon, 08 Sep 2014, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Running igt, I was encountering the invalid TLB bug on my 845g, despite
> that it was using the CS workaround. Examining the w/a buffer in the
> error state, showed that the copy from the user batch into the
> workaround itself was suffering from the inva
Running igt, I was encountering the invalid TLB bug on my 845g, despite
that it was using the CS workaround. Examining the w/a buffer in the
error state, showed that the copy from the user batch into the
workaround itself was suffering from the invalid TLB bug (the first
cacheline was broken with t
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:15:50AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:03:51AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 09:08:31AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Running igt, I was encountering the invalid TLB bug on my 845g, despite
> > > that it was using the
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:15:50AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:03:51AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 09:08:31AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Running igt, I was encountering the invalid TLB bug on my 845g, despite
> > > that it was using the
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:03:51AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 09:08:31AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Running igt, I was encountering the invalid TLB bug on my 845g, despite
> > that it was using the CS workaround. Examining the w/a buffer in the
> > error state, showed
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 09:08:31AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Running igt, I was encountering the invalid TLB bug on my 845g, despite
> that it was using the CS workaround. Examining the w/a buffer in the
> error state, showed that the copy from the user batch into the
> workaround itself was suf
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 09:08:31AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Running igt, I was encountering the invalid TLB bug on my 845g, despite
> that it was using the CS workaround. Examining the w/a buffer in the
> error state, showed that the copy from the user batch into the
> workaround itself was suf
Running igt, I was encountering the invalid TLB bug on my 845g, despite
that it was using the CS workaround. Examining the w/a buffer in the
error state, showed that the copy from the user batch into the
workaround itself was suffering from the invalid TLB bug (the first
cacheline was broken with t