Chasing wild speculation that we may be writing the wrong addresses
into the GTT for stolen objects, I would like to inspect those values.
Also to aide debugging ENOSPC issues with fragmentation, order the
object list by ascending GTT order so that holes are more easily seen.
Signed-off-by: Chris
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 03:59:00PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> is this going into any drm-intel GIT tree?
> I found it useful and saw it in your kernel-tree [1].
>
> - Sedat -
>
> [1]
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?id=bf91098a1232db771feac66f88720c181ef6196
Hi Chris,
is this going into any drm-intel GIT tree?
I found it useful and saw it in your kernel-tree [1].
- Sedat -
[1]
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?id=bf91098a1232db771feac66f88720c181ef61967
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Chasing wild specula
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:24:01AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Chris Wilson
>>> wrote:
>>> > I've just pushed a (cairo-based!) tool to intel-gpu-
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:24:01AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Chris Wilson
>> wrote:
>> > I've just pushed a (cairo-based!) tool to intel-gpu-tools,
>> > intel_framebuffer_dump, that should also confirm ev
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:24:01AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > I've just pushed a (cairo-based!) tool to intel-gpu-tools,
> > intel_framebuffer_dump, that should also confirm everything we've found
> > so far - i.e. that we read and writ
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> I've just pushed a (cairo-based!) tool to intel-gpu-tools,
> intel_framebuffer_dump, that should also confirm everything we've found
> so far - i.e. that we read and write consistently through the GTT into
> stolen memory. Which just leaves t
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Chris Wilson
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:31:24PM +0200, Sedat Dilek w
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Chris Wilson
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:31:24PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >>> Requested output and dmesg files attached.
> >>>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Chris Wilson
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:31:24PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Requested output and dmesg files attached.
( Should I a
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:31:24PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> Requested output and dmesg files attached.
>>> ( Should I attach the one with "BROKEN" display - I mean w/o doing a
>>>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:31:24PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Requested output and dmesg files attached.
>> ( Should I attach the one with "BROKEN" display - I mean w/o doing a
>> re-login and display "REPAIRED"? )
>
> Yes please.
Attached
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:31:24PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Requested output and dmesg files attached.
> ( Should I attach the one with "BROKEN" display - I mean w/o doing a
> re-login and display "REPAIRED"? )
Yes please.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
__
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Chasing wild speculation that we may be writing the wrong addresses
> into the GTT for stolen objects, I would like to inspect those values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> Cc: Sedat Dilek
> ---
>
> Sedak, can you please apply this patch a
Chasing wild speculation that we may be writing the wrong addresses
into the GTT for stolen objects, I would like to inspect those values.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Sedat Dilek
---
Sedak, can you please apply this patch and then attach the contents of
/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_gem_gtt
15 matches
Mail list logo