On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:17:00PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2014-06-30 8:45 GMT-03:00 Rodrigo Vivi :
> > As pointed out before we don't have a reliable way to read back ips
> > status on BDW without the risk to disable it when reading.
> > However now we are pretending that IPS on BDW is always
2014-06-30 8:45 GMT-03:00 Rodrigo Vivi :
> As pointed out before we don't have a reliable way to read back ips
> status on BDW without the risk to disable it when reading.
> However now we are pretending that IPS on BDW is always on and getting
> people confused about it.
>
> So this patch allows p
As pointed out before we don't have a reliable way to read back ips
status on BDW without the risk to disable it when reading.
However now we are pretending that IPS on BDW is always on and getting
people confused about it.
So this patch allows people to know if ips was ever attempted to be enable
As pointed out before we don't have a reliable way to read back ips
status on BDW without the risk to disable it when reading.
However now we are pretending that IPS on BDW is always on and getting
people confused about it.
So this patch allows people to know if ips was ever attempted to be enable
