Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't WARN on BDW when PCH is propperly identified.

2015-01-21 Thread shuang . he
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) Task id: 5607 -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied PNV 353/353

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't WARN on BDW when PCH is propperly identified.

2015-01-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Thanks Jani. Please ignore this patch... I'm testing the propper clean on BDWs here and submiting another patch, On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> We have BDW that PCH might not be propperly identified and we force it >> to be LPT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't WARN on BDW when PCH is propperly identified.

2015-01-20 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > We have BDW that PCH might not be propperly identified and we force it > to be LPT. However when we correctly identify it is LPT we > incorrectly WARN that this isn't a Haswell. For now we have many > platforms out there we still need to force LPT so let

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't WARN on BDW when PCH is propperly identified.

2015-01-19 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
We have BDW that PCH might not be propperly identified and we force it to be LPT. However when we correctly identify it is LPT we incorrectly WARN that this isn't a Haswell. For now we have many platforms out there we still need to force LPT so let's keep the force below, but let's remove the WARN