Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Document locking guidelines

2020-05-14 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Pushed using the note:: block. Thanks for the review and ack. Regards, Joonas ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Document locking guidelines

2020-04-16 Thread Dave Airlie
Acked-by: Dave Airlie On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 21:06, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Dave, ping for Acked-by here so we can merge? You already gave an > early ack in IRC while travelling. > > Regards, Joonas > > Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2019-08-30 13:50:53) > > To ensure cross-driver locking compatibil

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Document locking guidelines

2019-11-05 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Dave, ping for Acked-by here so we can merge? You already gave an early ack in IRC while travelling. Regards, Joonas Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2019-08-30 13:50:53) > To ensure cross-driver locking compatibility, document the expected > guidelines for implementing the GEM locking in i915. Note that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Document locking guidelines

2019-09-04 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 01:50:53PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > To ensure cross-driver locking compatibility, document the expected > guidelines for implementing the GEM locking in i915. Note that this > is a description of how things should end up after being reworked, > and does not reflect th

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Document locking guidelines

2019-08-30 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
To ensure cross-driver locking compatibility, document the expected guidelines for implementing the GEM locking in i915. Note that this is a description of how things should end up after being reworked, and does not reflect the current state of things. Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen Signed-off-by