On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:30:27AM -0700, Volkin, Bradley D wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:49:07AM -0700, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > vma->exec_entry = memset(&dummy_exec_entry, 0, sizeof(dummy_exec_entry);
> >
> > Then you can kill the additional if (entry) checks.
>
> Also, don't we need to se
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:49:07AM -0700, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:39:46AM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > When PPGGT is in use, we need to bind secure batches also to ggtt.
> > We used to pin, exec and unpin. This trick worked as there was nothing
> > competing in ggtt spac
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:39:46AM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> When PPGGT is in use, we need to bind secure batches also to ggtt.
> We used to pin, exec and unpin. This trick worked as there was nothing
> competing in ggtt space and the ppggt vma was used to tracking.
> But this left the ggtt vma
When PPGGT is in use, we need to bind secure batches also to ggtt.
We used to pin, exec and unpin. This trick worked as there was nothing
competing in ggtt space and the ppggt vma was used to tracking.
But this left the ggtt vma untracked and potentially it could vanish
during the batch execution.
