Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Add means to apply WA conditionally

2014-10-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Siluvery, Arun wrote: > On 23/10/2014 16:51, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:29:30PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: >>> >>> We would want to apply some of the workarounds based on a condition to a >>> particular platform or Gen but we may not kno

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Add means to apply WA conditionally

2014-10-23 Thread Siluvery, Arun
On 23/10/2014 16:51, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:29:30PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: We would want to apply some of the workarounds based on a condition to a particular platform or Gen but we may not know all possible controlling parameters in advance hence allow to define op

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Add means to apply WA conditionally

2014-10-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:29:30PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: > We would want to apply some of the workarounds based on a condition to a > particular platform or Gen but we may not know all possible controlling > parameters in advance hence allow to define open conditions; a WA makes > it to the l

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Add means to apply WA conditionally

2014-10-23 Thread Arun Siluvery
We would want to apply some of the workarounds based on a condition to a particular platform or Gen but we may not know all possible controlling parameters in advance hence allow to define open conditions; a WA makes it to the list only if the condition is true. With the appropriate conditions we