Hi Matt,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:44:11AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 14/10/2022 09:56, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > > On 13/10/2022 18:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> > > > i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
> > > > de
On 10/14/2022 12:52 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 14/10/2022 11:38, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
Hi Matt,
On 10/14/2022 12:13 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 14/10/2022 10:27, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
Hi Matt
On 10/14/2022 10:39 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 13/10/2022 18:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
i915_ttm_to_gem
On 14/10/2022 11:38, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
Hi Matt,
On 10/14/2022 12:13 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 14/10/2022 10:27, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
Hi Matt
On 10/14/2022 10:39 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 13/10/2022 18:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
dereferenc
Hi Matt,
On 10/14/2022 12:13 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 14/10/2022 10:27, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
Hi Matt
On 10/14/2022 10:39 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 13/10/2022 18:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
dereferenced in i915_ttm_access_memory without firs
On 14/10/2022 10:27, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
Hi Matt
On 10/14/2022 10:39 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 13/10/2022 18:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
dereferenced in i915_ttm_access_memory without first
checking if it is NULL. Inspecting
i915_ttm_io_mem_r
Hi,
A couple nit picks for the benefit of coding style.
On 13/10/2022 18:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
dereferenced in i915_ttm_access_memory without first
checking if it is NULL. Inspecting
i915_ttm_io_mem_reserve, it appears the correct
beha
On 14/10/2022 09:56, Andi Shyti wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 13/10/2022 18:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
dereferenced in i915_ttm_access_memory without first
checking if it is NULL. Inspecting
i915_ttm_
Hi Matt
On 10/14/2022 10:39 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 13/10/2022 18:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
dereferenced in i915_ttm_access_memory without first
checking if it is NULL. Inspecting
i915_ttm_io_mem_reserve, it appears the correct
behavior i
On 13.10.2022 19:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
dereferenced in i915_ttm_access_memory without first
checking if it is NULL. Inspecting
i915_ttm_io_mem_reserve, it appears the correct
behavior in this case is to return -EINVAL.
Fixes: 26b15eb0 ("d
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 13/10/2022 18:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> > i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
> > dereferenced in i915_ttm_access_memory without first
> > checking if it is NULL. Inspecting
> > i915_ttm_io_mem_reserve, it appear
Hi Jonathan,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 10:56:50AM -0700, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
> dereferenced in i915_ttm_access_memory without first
> checking if it is NULL. Inspecting
> i915_ttm_io_mem_reserve, it appears the correct
> behavior in this case
On 13/10/2022 18:56, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
dereferenced in i915_ttm_access_memory without first
checking if it is NULL. Inspecting
i915_ttm_io_mem_reserve, it appears the correct
behavior in this case is to return -EINVAL.
The GEM object has
i915_ttm_to_gem can return a NULL pointer, which is
dereferenced in i915_ttm_access_memory without first
checking if it is NULL. Inspecting
i915_ttm_io_mem_reserve, it appears the correct
behavior in this case is to return -EINVAL.
Fixes: 26b15eb0 ("drm/i915/ttm: implement access_memory")
Signed-
13 matches
Mail list logo
