On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:16:29PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 07:17:02AM +, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > It's a little overkill?
> >
> > They just need to know if the cache tables have changed and to be able to
> > sync their indexes to the KMD.
>
> We already shot ou
h...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 2:47 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Widawsky, Benjamin
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/sysfs: Adding mocs_state
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:32:53PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
Will wait for more comments, then w
e way and come up with a way for userspace to
reconfigure the MOCS table at will?
> Peter.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 5:56 PM
> To: Antoine, Peter
> Cc: Chris Wilson ; intel-gfx@lists.freed
Anymore feedback on this?
-Original Message-
From: Antoine, Peter
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 8:17 AM
To: Ville Syrjälä
Cc: Chris Wilson ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
Widawsky, Benjamin
Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/sysfs: Adding mocs_state
It's a little ove
.intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 5:56 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: Chris Wilson ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
Widawsky, Benjamin
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/sysfs: Adding mocs_state
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:51:21PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
>
> Sorry Ville,
> mocs/control_state
> >> mocs/l3cc_state
> >>
> >> for the different tables?
> >>
> >> Peter.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-
> >> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 2:
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 05:38:41PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:23:35PM +, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > No, It's not debug.
> > It's for syncing and aligning (and validating) the open-source userspace
> > with the kernel cache policy.
>
> Why doesn't userspace just us
mocs/l3cc_state
for the different tables?
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 2:47 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Widawsky, Benjamin
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/sysfs: Adding m
r the different tables?
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 2:47 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Widawsky, Benjamin
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/sysfs: Adding mocs_state
for the different tables?
>
> Peter.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 2:47 PM
> To: Antoine, Peter
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Widawsky, Benjamin
>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx]
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:32:53PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> Will wait for more comments, then will respin with a different
> commit message. Is the rest of the patch ok?
No, you've put debug information into sysfs. (Also sysfs is one value per
file.) sysfs does not match your goal of validati
Will wait for more comments, then will respin with a different commit
message. Is the rest of the patch ok?
Peter.
On Wed, 4 May 2016, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:16:23PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
The following patch adds the current MOCS state to the sysfs file
system.
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:16:23PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> The following patch adds the current MOCS state to the sysfs file
> system. This patch has been added so that userspace can validate the
> MOCS settings that have been programmed.
These only correspond to the state the kernel may pro
The following patch adds the current MOCS state to the sysfs file
system. This patch has been added so that userspace can validate the
MOCS settings that have been programmed.
Tracked-On: https://jira01.devtools.intel.com/browse/VIZ-7767
Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915
14 matches
Mail list logo
