Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Hide dangerous tests

2017-11-06 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-11-06 10:47:52) > On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 16:32 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Some tests are designed to exercise the limits of the HW and may trigger > > unintended side-effects making the machine unusable. This should not be > > executed by default, but are still usef

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Hide dangerous tests

2017-11-06 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 16:32 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Some tests are designed to exercise the limits of the HW and may trigger > unintended side-effects making the machine unusable. This should not be > executed by default, but are still useful for early platform validation. > > References: htt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Hide dangerous tests

2017-10-26 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Chris Wilson wrote: > Some tests are designed to exercise the limits of the HW and may trigger > unintended side-effects making the machine unusable. This should not be > executed by default, but are still useful for early platform validation. > > References: https://bugs.free

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Hide dangerous tests

2017-10-25 Thread Chris Wilson
Some tests are designed to exercise the limits of the HW and may trigger unintended side-effects making the machine unusable. This should not be executed by default, but are still useful for early platform validation. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103453 Signed-off-by: C