Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Sanitory checks for platform that dont have GuC

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-12 às 16:13 -0700, Anusha Srivatsa escreveu: > i915.enable_guc_loading/submission=2 forces the usage of GuC. > For platforms that do not have a GuC, asking the kernel to > use a GuC should not result in an error state. Do extra checks > to see if the platform even has a GuC or not,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Sanitory checks for platform that dont have GuC

2016-10-12 Thread Anusha Srivatsa
i915.enable_guc_loading/submission=2 forces the usage of GuC. For platforms that do not have a GuC, asking the kernel to use a GuC should not result in an error state. Do extra checks to see if the platform even has a GuC or not, regardless of the kernel parameter. v2: Based on Rodrigo's patch and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Sanitory checks for platform that dont have GuC

2016-10-11 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Ter, 2016-10-11 às 10:36 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Anusha Srivatsa > wrote: > > > > i915.enable_guc_loading/submission=2 forces the usage of GuC. > > For platforms that do not have a GuC, asking the kernel to > > use a GuC should not result in an error state. Do extra

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Sanitory checks for platform that dont have GuC

2016-10-11 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > i915.enable_guc_loading/submission=2 forces the usage of GuC. > For platforms that do not have a GuC, asking the kernel to > use a GuC should not result in an error state. Do extra checks > to see if the platform even has a GuC or not, regardless of th

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Sanitory checks for platform that dont have GuC

2016-10-10 Thread Anusha Srivatsa
i915.enable_guc_loading/submission=2 forces the usage of GuC. For platforms that do not have a GuC, asking the kernel to use a GuC should not result in an error state. Do extra checks to see if the platform even has a GuC or not, regardless of the kernel parameter. Based on Rodriogo's patch. Have

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Sanitory checks for platform that dont have GuC

2016-10-07 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
>-Original Message- >From: Vivi, Rodrigo >Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 7:06 AM >To: Zanoni, Paulo R >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Srivatsa, Anusha > >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Sanitory checks for platform >that >dont have GuC >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Sanitory checks for platform that dont have GuC

2016-10-07 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 10:41 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 16:50 -0700, Anusha Srivatsa escreveu: > > i915.enable_guc_loading/submission=2 forces the usage of GuC. > > For platforms that do not have a GuC, asking the kernel to > > use a GuC should not result in an error state. D

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Sanitory checks for platform that dont have GuC

2016-10-07 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 16:50 -0700, Anusha Srivatsa escreveu: > i915.enable_guc_loading/submission=2 forces the usage of GuC. > For platforms that do not have a GuC, asking the kernel to > use a GuC should not result in an error state. Do extra checks > to see if the platform even has a GuC or not,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Sanitory checks for platform that dont have GuC

2016-10-05 Thread Anusha Srivatsa
i915.enable_guc_loading/submission=2 forces the usage of GuC. For platforms that do not have a GuC, asking the kernel to use a GuC should not result in an error state. Do extra checks to see if the platform even has a GuC or not, regardless of the kernel parameter. Cc: Zanoni Paulo Signed-off-by: