Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Use i915_probe_error instead of drm_err

2022-04-14 Thread Gupta, Anshuman
> -Original Message- > From: Belgaumkar, Vinay > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 8:38 PM > To: Gupta, Anshuman > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Use i915_probe_error &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Use i915_probe_error instead of drm_err

2022-04-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, "Belgaumkar, Vinay" wrote: > On 4/13/2022 11:41 PM, Anshuman Gupta wrote: >> On 2022-04-13 at 04:18:52 +0530, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: >>> This will ensure we don't have false positives when we run >>> error injection tests. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar >>> --- >>>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Use i915_probe_error instead of drm_err

2022-04-14 Thread Belgaumkar, Vinay
On 4/13/2022 11:41 PM, Anshuman Gupta wrote: On 2022-04-13 at 04:18:52 +0530, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: This will ensure we don't have false positives when we run error injection tests. Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 42 ++---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Use i915_probe_error instead of drm_err

2022-04-13 Thread Anshuman Gupta
On 2022-04-13 at 04:18:52 +0530, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > This will ensure we don't have false positives when we run > error injection tests. > > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 42 ++--- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Use i915_probe_error instead of drm_err

2022-04-12 Thread Vinay Belgaumkar
This will ensure we don't have false positives when we run error injection tests. Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 42 ++--- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.